Stanton v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Carolyn Rosemary Espina Stanton
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Loan Network LLC, Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc.,, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Other Doe Entities 1-10
Case Number: 1:2009cv00404
Filed: August 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: DAVID ALAN EZRA
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S 66 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING FIDELITY ESCROW NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII, INC.'S 69 RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 8, 12, & 14 OF PLAI NTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on November 30, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
October 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 10/19/2010. ~ Orde r Amends Order, document no. 42 ; "The Court's amended order does not change the Court's original holding and is provided for clarification purposes only." (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE< /center>Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). RE: Service upon George J. Zweibel, Esq. Because mail addressed to Mr. Zweibel has been returned by the postal service, a separate Court's Certificate of Service will be entered when service of the instant order is executed upon Mr. Zweibel. (afc)
October 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 AMENDED ORDER DENYING FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 46 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 10/18/2010. ~ Amended Order to correct typographical error; Order amends Order, document no. 52 ~ (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER DENYING FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 46 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 9/30/2010. [Motions terminated: 46 Motion for Reconsideration. 48 Motion for Joinder in Motio n for Reconsideration. Related document: Order, doc 42 : "ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT"] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on October 1, 2010.
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 . ~ Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Count XIII and GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE a s to XI. The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion as to Count VIII only as to Plaintiff's claim regarding failure to receive the Loan Documents and GRANTS Defendant's Motion as to Count VIII as to all other allegations. The Court DENIES Fid elity Escrow's Motion as to Count XIV only as to Plaintiff's factual allegations regarding Fidelity Escrow's failure to timely provide Plaintiff with the Loan Documents and GRANTS Fidelity Escrow's Motion as to Count XIV as to all other allegations. ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 7/30/2010. [Order follows hearing on Motion 31 held 7/12/2010; Minutes-docket entry no. 41 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPartici pants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanton v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Rosemary Espina Stanton
Represented By: George J. Zweibel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loan Network LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity National Title & Escrow of Hawaii, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Corporations 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Partnerships 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Other Doe Entities 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?