Pacific Fleet Submarine Memorial Association, Inc. v. United States Department of the Navy et al
| Pacific Fleet Submarine Memorial Association, Inc. |
| United States Department of the Navy, Hawai'i State Department of Human Services, John Does 1-10 and Doe Government Agencies 1-10 |
| 1:2009cv00467 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER: (1) GRANTING BOWFIN MUSEUM'S MOTION TO DISMISS 97 ; (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE BOWFIN MUSEUM'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; (3) DENYING AS MOOT THE NAVY'S MOTION TO DISMISS BOWFIN MUSEUM'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 107 ; (4) DENYING AS MOOT DHS'S MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, BOWFIN MUSEUM'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES 109 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 3/14/2011. (afc)CERT IFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE NAVY'S MOTION TO DISMISS 56 ; (2) GRANTING DHS'S MOTION TO DISMISS 70 ; (3) DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; (4) DENYING AS MOOT BOWFIN MUSEUM'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ 68]; AND (5) VACATING HEARING ORDER. ~ Bowfin Museum is granted not more than 30 days from the filing of this order to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Court instructs Bowfin Museum that all claims arising from the RSA are dismissed with prejudic e, and Bowfin Museum is prohibited from including such claims in any Second Amended Complaint. Bowfin Museum is further instructed that it is not granted leave to add new claims; rather, the Second Amended Complaint may only add facts and pleadings t o cure the Rule 8 deficiencies in the remaining claims. Failure to abide by this Court may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 7/23/2010. (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications -- Heidi M. Rian, Esq.-- will be served by first class mail on July 26, 2010.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
