Abbey v. Hawaii Employers Mutual Insurance Company (HEMIC) et al
Plaintiff: Anastasia Victorina Lehuanani Abbey
Defendant: Hawaii Employers Mutual Insurance Company (HEMIC), Michael Redman, Robert Dove, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and Doe Corporations 1-20
Case Number: 1:2009cv00545
Filed: November 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 202 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/7/11. ("Defendants are granted summary judgment on the retaliation claim, but the discrimin ation claim remains for further adjudication, as provided for in the earlier order. In all other respects, the earlier order remains in effect.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to r eceive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 88 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/21/10. ("For the foregoing reasons, the court grants Defendants' Motion for Summa ry Judgment for violation of public policy, insurance bad faith, and abuse of process. The court denies summary judgment with respect to claimed violations of Title VII and Hawaii Revised Statutes § 378-2, and the intentional infliction of emoti onal distress claim. These claims are left for further adjudication.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were shall be served by first class mail on December 22, 2010.
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS 152 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/15/10. (" The documents at issue may temporarily be filed under seal to allow th e orderly determination of whether and how much of any document may be sealed. Defendants may file a motion to permanently seal documents under Local Rule 83.12(b) by November 17, 2010. Until the court rules on whether and what can be sealed , the parties should attempt to talk around the record and not identify the employee, medical or health conditions, or the details of other matters in any potentially sealed filing. See 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(b)(1); LR 83.12(d). If Defendant s do not file a motion by November 17, 2010, the court may unseal the documents and open them to public inspection. Notwithstanding the deadlines under Local Rule 83.12(b), Plaintiff may file any timely opposition to the motion to seal by Nov ember 22, 2010, and Defendants may submit a reply by November 24, 2010. This order disposes of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Documents Relating to Joseph Benevides' Worker's Compensation Records, ECF No. [ 152]. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate that motion.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON UNTIMELINESS AND MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON FAILURE TO PLEAD FACTS TO MAKE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS PLAUSIBLE 52 ; 53 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/22/10. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 9 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/15/10. (This court grants the motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to claims against Redman and Dove in Counts I and II. The court further dismisses Claims III to VIII in their entirety. This leaves for further adjudication only claims against HEMIC in Counts I and II.) (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParti cipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications shall be served by first class mail on April 16, 2010.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abbey v. Hawaii Employers Mutual Insurance Company (HEMIC) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anastasia Victorina Lehuanani Abbey
Represented By: Glenn H. Uesugi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaii Employers Mutual Insurance Company (HEMIC)
Represented By: Robert P. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Redman
Represented By: Robert P. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Dove
Represented By: Robert P. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Corporations 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?