Nosie v. Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO et al
| Patricia Elizabeth Nosie |
| Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO and Mark C. Stotik |
| 1:2010cv00062 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Kauai |
| ALAN C KAY |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 33 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 11/18/10. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER REJECTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 32 , 36 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 9/17/10. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registe red to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND, AND (2) GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 20 , 12 , 21 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 6/28/10. (eps ) -- (1) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Remand; (2) CONSTRUES Plaintiff's Complaint as alleging a claim only against the union. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order adding Mark Stotik as a defendant if she wishes to do so; (3) FINDS that Plaintiff has withdrawn her claims that allege discrimination. The Court shall disregard any current reference to discrimination in the Complaint. Now that Plaintiff understands that her Complaint is properly in feder al court however, she is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order properly alleging discrimination under Title VII or the ADEA, or a breach of the duty of fair representation based on discrimination ; (4) GRANTS IN PART, and DENIES IN PART, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claim for breach of the duty of fair representation; Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Ord er properly alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation based on bad faith CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
