Dawkins v. City and County of Honolulu et al
| Whitney Dawkins, Jr. |
| City and County of Honolulu, Zane Hamrick, Barry Tong, John Does 1-10 and Windward Community Federal Credit Union |
| 1:2010cv00086 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
281
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF WHITNEY DAWKINS, JR.S MOTION FOR NEWTRIAL OR AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT (DOC. 272 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 5/31/2012. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive ele ctronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
280
ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' BILL OF COSTS AS UNTIMELY (DOC. 270 ) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (DOC. 274 ) A ND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR TAXATION OF COSTS (DOC. 268 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 4/27/2012. ~ The Court DECLINES to adopt the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to Deny Plaintiff's Objectio n to Defendants Bill of Costs as Untimely (Doc. 270 ). Plaintiffs Motion for Enlargement of Time to File an Objection to the Defendants Bill of Costs (Doc. 274 ), which the Court construes as an Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff's Objection as Untimely, is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Taxation of Costs (Doc. 268 ) isDENIED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 73 AS MODIFIED. Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 1/20/2011. ~ On page 2, lines 6-7, the phrase the Statement of No Opposition filed by the Defendants City and County, shall read inst ead: the Statement of No Opposition filed by the Defendants City and County of Honolulu, Barry Tong, and Zane Hamrick. ** Petition is granted, and that the claims against Windward Community Federal Credit Union be dismissed with prejudiced. Further claims against Windward Community Federal Credit Union are hereby barred. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry Modified on 1/20/2011 (ecs, ).
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU'S 34 MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on December 30, 2010. (bbb, )CERTIFIC ATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/30/2010: # 1 Main Document) (bbb, ).
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS HAMRICK AND TONG'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT (DOC. 17 ) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 33 ) . ~ Excerpts of conclusion: "Defendants' motion to dismiss the claim that Defendants Hamrick and Tong violated Plaintiff's rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Cause of Action IV) is GRANTED.&qu ot; "Plaintiff must file a First Amended Complaint alleging a sufficient equal protection claim on or before October 1, 2010, or the claim will be dismissed with prejudice." ~ Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 8/31/2010. [Order follows hearing on Motion 17 held 8/30/2010; Minutes-docket entry no. 40 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
