Falahee v. Heide and Cook, Ltd. et al
| Thomas M. Falahee |
| Heide and Cook, Ltd., John Does 1-10 and Doe Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2010cv00218 |
| April 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| UNASSIGNED |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 41 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION: "The Judgement was entered on September 21, 2010. Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration, filed September 22, 2010, (Doc. 41), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on October 20, 2010. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEIDE AND COOK LTD.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ALL CLAIMS (Doc 10 ). ~ The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Heide and Cook Ltd. and to close the case. ~ Signed by Senior JUDGE HEL EN GILLMOR on 8/31/2010. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING 35 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND THIS CASE TO STATE COURT FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY REMOVE AND LACK OF FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION BE DENIED. Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLM OR on August 27, 2010. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
35
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF'S 16 MOTION TO REMAND THIS CASE TO STATE COURT FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY REMOVE AND LACK OF FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION BE DENIED: "the Court concludes that Defendant timely removed the action from state court to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). In addition, the Court concludes that it has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims as his claims are completely preempted pursuant to LMRA § 301. Accordingly, th e Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motion for remand be DENIED.". Signed by Magistrate Judge BARRY M. KURREN on July 30, 2010. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electroni c notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
