Kosegarten v. The Department of the Prosecuting Attorney, County of Maui et al
| Marie J. Kosegarten |
| The Department of the Prosecuting Attorney, County of Maui, Benjamin M. Acob, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2010cv00321 |
| June 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Maui |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION BASED ON GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY J UDGMENT ON CLAIMS OF RETALIATION AND DEFAMATION re 177 ; 184 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 2/21/13. "Defendants' Discrimination Motion is DENIED as to the portions Count I and Count IV, Plaintiff's Tit le VII and Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2 claims, alleging gender discrimination claims based on her termination. Defendants' Retaliation Motion is DENIED as to the portions Count III and Count IV, Plaintiff's Title VII and Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2 claims, based on her termination. The motions are GRANTED in all other respects. In addition, this Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendants Acob and Tate as to the portion of Count IV alleging Plaintiff's § ; 378-2(3) claim against them. Insofar as this Court has granted summary judgment to Defendant Acob and Defendant Tate on all claims against them, this Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to terminate them as parties. The only claims remaining for trial are the portions of Counts I, III, and IV alleging gender discrimination and retaliation claims against the County based on Plaintiff's termination." (emt, )< center>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON AIDING AND ABETTING CLAIMS 142 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/30/2012. related: Minute order issued 9/27/2012 denying M/SJ: doc no. 187 . (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FOR INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS 74 AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON TIME-BARRED CLAIMS 78 . Sig ned by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 8/31/2012. ~ Order follows hearing held 8/8/2012. Minutes: doc no. 164 ~ (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 63 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 4/5/2012. (afc) CERTIFICATE O F SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' 40 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS ON CERTAIN CLAIMS, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: "On the basis of the foregoin g, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Certain Claims, filed August 11, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that: Plaintiff's Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2(1) and (2 ) claims against Defendant Acob and Defendant Tate are DISMISSED; Count IX of the First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and the Court rules that the First Amended Complaint does not allege a Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2(3) claim. The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT in all other respects. The Court, however, GRANTS Plaintiff's request for leave to amend her complaint. Plaintiff has leave to file a Second Amended Complaint according to the terms of this order. Plaintiff must file her Second Amen ded Complaint by no later than December 21, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on November 29, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive ele ctronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
