Angel v. Capital Research Group, Inc. et al
||Jack Edward Angel
||Capital Research Group, Inc., Daniel P. Doyle and Fred Overstreet
||June 30, 2010
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 28, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS AS AMENDED; DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS 40 . Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 6/28/201 2. ~ 1. Defendants having failed to answer or otherwise defend the First Amended Complaint, have been adjudged to be in default, and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law against all Defendants, jointly and severally. Ac cordingly, Defendants shall pay to Plaintiff the amount of Five Hundred Nineteen Thousand, Two Hundred Seventy-Eight Dollars and Eighty-Seven Cents ($519,278.87), plus interest after March 31, 2012, accruing at a rate of One Hundred Seventy Doll ars and Seventy-Two Cents ($170.72) per day until judgment. 2. Defendants shall further pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees in the amount of Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($12,839.72) and costs of suit i n the amount of Seven Hundred Seventy Two Dollars and Seventy-Six Cents ($772.76). (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Default Defendants served at addresses in entry 37 by first class mail on 6/29/2012
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?