Ruggles v. Weber et al
Michael Doyle Ruggles |
John Weber, Samuel Jelsma, Larry Weber, Harry Kubojiri, Lawrence Mahuna, Lincoln Ashida, Jay Kimura, Harry Kim and Billy Kenoi |
1:2010cv00367 |
July 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Hawaii |
UNASSIGNED |
LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SAMUEL JELSMA, LARRY WEBER, HARRY KUBOJIRI, LAWRENCE MAHUNA, LINCOLN ASHIDA, JAY KIMURA, HARRY KIM, AND BILLY KENOI'S MOTION TO DISMISS 47 AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT JOHN WEBER'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFIC IENT SERVICE OF PROCESS 64 . Excerpt of Order: ~ "The Court HEREBY DISMISSES the Third Amended Complaint against the Moving Defendants WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court further DISMISSES the Third Amended Complai nt against Defendant John Weber WITHOUT PREJUDICE." "The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case." ~ Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 8/22/2011. [related docket entry: Court's Minute Order, docket ent ry no. 60 ] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.