I. v. Department of Education
Plaintiff: Marcus I.
Defendant: Department of Education
Case Number: 1:2010cv00381
Filed: July 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Maui
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER REMANDING ISSUE OF HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT TO HEARINGS OFFICER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/22/2014. "This court accordingly remands the reimbursement issue to the hearing officer. The Clerk of Court is directed to stay this action while the reimbursement issue is pending before the hearing officer and to administratively close this case. If an appeal is filed from the hearing officer's decision on the reimbursement issue, that appe al shall be filed under the civil number in the present case." Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00342-SOM-BMK, 1:10-cv-00381-SOM-BMK(emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic noti fications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 6/10/13. "The court affirms the decision of the Hearings Officer dated June 1, 2012, for the reasons stated above . The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in both consolidated cases (Civ. No. 10-00381 SOM/BMK and Civ. No. 12-00342 SOM/BMK)." Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00342-SOM-BMK, 1:10-cv-00381-SOM-BMK(emt, )CERTI FICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
August 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER DENYING (1) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT, DIRECTING THAT A GARNISHEE SUMMONS ISSUE, AND IMPOSING SAN CTIONS re 77 ; 83 ; 93 - - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/24/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
April 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY PUT re 62 ; 67 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/12/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
June 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 37 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 6/14/11. ("Any such briefing that Marcus's mother may seek to address to this court should be by way of motion filed no later than Jun e 30, 2011.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER PARTIALLY VACATING AND REMANDING THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S JUNE 9, 2010, DECISION - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/9/11. ("If, following remand, an appeal of the Hearings Officer's new ruling is appealed to this federal court, the court directs the appealing party to inform the Clerk of Court that the appeal is related to the present case and so should be assigned to the same judge.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: I. v. Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus I.
Represented By: Matthew C. Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?