Park v. Oahu Transit Services, Inc. et al
Scott Park |
Oahu Transit Services, Inc., Stanford Shiroma, Ralph Nishimura, Lulani Santiago and Aileen Black |
1:2010cv00445 |
July 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
DAVID ALAN EZRA |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 30 ; (2) DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S TITLE VII CLAIM AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; (3) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL REMAINING CLAIMS AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; AN D (4) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND. ~ excerpt of order: "Accordingly, the FAC, with the exception of Plaintiff's Title VII claim, is DISMISSED as against the Individual Defendants in this action, wit h leave to amend no later than 30 days from the filing of this Order." Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 8/10/2011. [Order follows hearing held 8/5/2011 on Motion to Dismiss (doc 30). Minutes of hearing: doc no. 49 ] (afc, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.