Santiago et al v. Bismark Mortgage Company, LLC et al
| David Santiago and Bridgette Medeiros |
| Bismark Mortgage Company, LLC, Island Home Loans, John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20, Doe Corporations 1-20, Doe Partnerships 1-20, Doe Entities 1-20 and Doe Governmental Entities 1-20 |
| 1:2010cv00467 |
| August 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| UNASSIGNED |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/4/11. (The court GRANTS Bismark's motion for summary judgment and dismisses from this suit Santiago's causes of action for violations of RESP A, TILA and FDCPA. Lacking federal question or diversity jurisdiction, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and DISMISSES this action. The clerk shall close this case.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications shall be served by First Class Mail at the addresses of record on March 7, 2011. (emt, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
