Korab et al v. Koller et al
| Tony Korab, Tojio Clanton and Keben Enoch |
| Lillian B. Koller and Kenneth Fink |
| 1:2010cv00483 |
| August 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES re: 140 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/20/2015. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registe red to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
140
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES re: 136 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 7/15/2015. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DOC. NO. 108 ; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS' COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 116 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/5/2015. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING NEW RESIDENTS; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 62 ; 63 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/28/11. (emt, )< center>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 10 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/13/10. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Denying Defendants' Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted As to COFA Residents 8 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 11/10/10. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
