Daniels v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court Daniels v. United States of America

Daniels v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Joe Daniels
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2010cv00495
Filed:	August 29, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	HELEN GILLMOR
Presiding Judge:	BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 9, 2011	Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE 3 . Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 3/9/2011. ~ The Court's February 23, 2011 Order (Doc. 3) is hereby amended to i nclude the following correction. The only change is to add an omitted word on pages 19-20. The sentence Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right is ame nded to read: Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants regi stered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 3/10/2011 the date of this docket entry Modified on 3/9/2011 (ecs, ).
February 23, 2011	Filing 3 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE 1 . Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 2/23/2011. ~ Petitioners Motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIE D. Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because he has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (CR 08-00104HG-03)(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants r egistered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications (Joe Daniels)were served by first class mail on 2/24/2011. Modified service text on 2/23/2011 (ecs, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 9, 2011

Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE 3 . Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 3/9/2011. ~ The Court's February 23, 2011 Order (Doc. 3) is hereby amended to i nclude the following correction. The only change is to add an omitted word on pages 19-20. The sentence Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right is ame nded to read: Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants regi stered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 3/10/2011 the date of this docket entry Modified on 3/9/2011 (ecs, ).

February 23, 2011

Filing 3 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE 1 . Signed by Senior JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 2/23/2011. ~ Petitioners Motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIE D. Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability because he has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (CR 08-00104HG-03)(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants r egistered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications (Joe Daniels)were served by first class mail on 2/24/2011. Modified service text on 2/23/2011 (ecs, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Joe Daniels
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Thomas Muehleck
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?