Hernandez v. USA
Petitioner: Todd Anthony Hernandez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2010cv00674
Filed: November 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING "REQUEST CLARIFICATION AND RECONSIDERATION ON OBJECTIONS ENTERED" AND DENYING "MOTION TO MAKE A COMPLETE FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW TO RECTIFY A GRAVE MANIFEST MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. , RULE 52(a)" - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/12/11. ("The court now directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment consistent with the ruling filed on June 29, 2011. Hernandez is reminded that if, after judgment has been entered, he seeks reconsideration, he is limited to a memorandum that is no longer than either 30 pages or 9000 words. If Hernandez opts for the page limit rather than the word limit, Hernandez must comply with the court's formatting r ules.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Todd Anthony Hernandez served by first class mail at the address of record on September 12, 2011.
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DENYING TODD ANTHONY HERNANDEZ'S PETITION FOR RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C.§ 2255, ECF NO. 157 ; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT HERNANDEZ'S MOTION TO AMEND PETITION, ECF NO. 178 ; ORDER DENYING HERNANDEZ'S 1) REQUEST THAT THIS COURT INVES TIGATE WHY A DOCUMENT WAS NOT FILED, 2) MOTION TO COMPEL HIS OWN COUNSEL TO RELEASE DOCUMENTS; AND 3) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS REPLY BRIEF, ECF NO. 179 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 6/29/11. ("Given the breadth and number of issues raised by Hernandez in his § 2255 Petition, the court will not enter judgment in favor of the Government until after July 25, 2011. If Hernandez knows of any issue raised in his § 2255 filings that this cou rt has overlooked in the present order, he should identify the issue(s) in writing no later than July 25, 2011." "The Clerk of Court is directed not to enter judgment unless July 25, 2011, passes without either (1) an identification by Hernandez that the court missed issues or (2) this court otherwise instructs.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Todd Anthony Hernandez shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on June 30, 2011.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Michael K. Kawahara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Todd Anthony Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?