Henao v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
| Jose Henao |
| Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., Charlie Barker, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-10, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10 |
| 1:2010cv00772 |
| December 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF. NO. 87) re 87 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/26/13. " The court grants summary judgment in favor of Wyndham on Hen ao's retaliation claims asserted in Counts IV and VIII. Summary judgment is denied with respect to the claims that Henao was demoted and suffered a hostile work environment based on his national origin and age, as asserted in Counts I, III, V, and VII. These are the only claims remaining for adjudication." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
