Young v. Lau et al
| Suanne N. Young |
| Robert M. Ehrhorn, Jr., John Does (Investors) 1-10,000, Mark K. Ioane, Alvin Sakamoto, Constance H. Lau, Natalie Taniguchi and Terence Yeh |
| 1:2011cv00110 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF SUANNE YOUNG'S 1 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION: "On the basis of the foregoing, Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Application for Temporary Injunction, filed February 18, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as set forth herein. Failure tofile an amended complaint by March 31, 2011 will result in dismissal of this action. If she so chooses, Plain tiff may also file a renewed motion for temporary restraining order. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on February 22, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
