Cootey et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
||Timothy A. Cootey and Delores A. Cootey
||Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, John Does 1-10, Jane Roes 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Other Entities 1-10
||March 9, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1601
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 12, 2011
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (2) DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS re 27 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/12/11. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|June 14, 2011
ORDER Granting Defendants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. And BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP's Motion to Dismiss re 9 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 6/13/11. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants regi stered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?