Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: Does 1-15, Global Horizons, Inc., Captain Cook Coffee Company Ltd., Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii), Kauai Coffee Company, Inc., Kelena Farms, Inc., Mac Farms of Hawaii, LLC and Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00257
Filed: April 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: DAVID ALAN EZRA
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 768 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT CAPTAIN COOK COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.'S CROSS-CLAIM SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 1/8/2015. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/2/2015 10:30 AM before JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI. "This Court directs the Clerks Office to serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause on Mr. McLaughlin at both the Adrian Court address and the Strawberry Hill address." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). A copy of the order was served to Captain Cook Coffee Company, Ltd., Attn: Steve McLaughlin, President at 32 Adrian Court, Burlingame, CA 94010 and at 3058 Strawberry Hill Road, Pebble Beach, CA 93953 on January 8, 2015. Modified on 1/8/2015 (emt, ).
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 767 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/19/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 714 ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 704 re 713 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 08/20/2014. -- this Court FINDS that there is good cause to discipline the EEOC's counsel, Sue Noh, Esq., and Anna Park, Esq., for violating the Local Rules and this Court's oral instructions. This Court will file a disciplinary complaint against Ms. Noh and Ms. Park with the State Bar of California. Further, this Court will not consider the EEOC&# 039;s pending request to approve the four Consent Decrees unless the EEOC holds a press conference in compliance with the terms of this Order. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to r eceive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 709 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) re 686 ; re 687 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 06/30/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 685 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS: MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE EEOC'S PATTERN OR PRACTICE CLAIM OF HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT GLOBAL HORIZONS, INC.; MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE EEOC'S PATTERN OR PRACTIC E CLAIM OF DISPARATE TREATMENT AGAINST GLOBAL HORIZONS, INC.; AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE EEOC'S PATTERN OR PRACTICE CLAIM OF RETALIATION AGAINST GLOBAL HORIZONS, INC. re 606 re 610 re 616 . Signed by JUDGE LESL IE E. KOBAYASHI on 03/19/2014. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 683 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT MAUI PINEAPPLE COMPANY, LTD.'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES RELATING TO EEOC'S CONDITIONS PRECEDENT, ETC. (AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE NO.;S 8, 22, 29, 30) AND GRANTING IN PAR T AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT MAUI PINEAPPLE COMPANY, LTD.S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES: 1, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 & 32 - 586 ; 589 . Signed by JUDGE LESLI E E. KOBAYASHI on 02/28/2014. -- the EEOC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.'s Affirmative Defenses Relating to EEOC's Conditions Precedent, etc. (Affirmative Defen se No.'s 8, 22, 29, 30), filed November 1, 2013, is HEREBY GRANTED, and the EEOC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.'s Affirmative Defenses: 1, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 & 32, also filed November 1, 2013, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 504 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DECEMBER 21, 2012 ORDER re: 491 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 2/26/2013. ~ Appeal (doc 491 ) re: Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi's December 21, 2012 Order: (doc no. 479 ): "Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order re: Immigration Status, and Information related to Immigration Status." Motions terminated: 491 Appeal, a nd Joinders in Appeal, doc nos. 494 and 495 ~ (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 500 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 8, 2012 ORDER re: Motion, doc no. 431 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 1/30/2013. ~ Court' ;s November 8, 2012 Order: doc no. 399 : "Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint and Substantive Joinders Thereto" (afc) CERTIFICATE OF S ERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
March 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO STRIKE 143 , 161 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 ; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 138 , 141 , 145 , 146 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 ; (3) GRANTING PLAINTIF F LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; AND (4) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO SEVER WITHOUT PREJUDICE 140 , 144 , 160 , 171 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 3/16/2012. Excerpt of Order: ~ "[T]he Court will grant Plaintiff leave to amend its complaint one last time. Failure to cure the pleading deficiencies identified [in the order] shall result in dismissal of those claims with prejudice. The Third Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than forty-five (45) days from the filing of this Order. Each of the Moving Defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of the Third Amended Complaint to file an answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaint...." ~ [Order follows hearing held March 12, 2012. Minutes of hearing: doc no. 226 ] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on March 19, 2012.
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 227 ORDER: (1) GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO INTERVENE; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO STAY re 178 - Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 3/13/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY 109 ; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 20 , 22 , 29 , 39 , 46 , 48 , 58 , 59 AND (3) DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE MOVING DEFENDANTS. Excerpt of order: ~ As to the Motion to Stay (doc 109 ): "[T]he Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Stay with respect to the Moving Defendants and GRANTS the Motion to Stay with resp ect to Defendant Global [Global Horizons, Inc.]. The Court...will revisit the stay if and when Defendant Global files an appearance and moves to lift the stay." Re: Motions to Dismiss: "[T]he FAC [First Amended Complaint] is...DISMI SSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all Moving Defendants with leave to amend no later than forty-five (45) days from the filing of this Order." ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 11/2/2011. [Order follows hearing held 10/26/2011 on Moti on to Stay and Motions to Dismiss. Minutes of hearing: doc no. 119 ] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on November 3, 2011.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-15
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Global Horizons, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Cook Coffee Company Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kauai Coffee Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelena Farms, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mac Farms of Hawaii, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: Michael J. Farrell
Represented By: Lorena Garcia-Bautista
Represented By: Thomas S. Lepak
Represented By: Sue J. Noh
Represented By: Anna Y. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?