International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 v. Hawaiian Airlines
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 |
Hawaiian Airlines |
Hawaiian Airlines |
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 |
1:2011cv00271 |
April 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Railway Labor Act |
45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 26 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S 28 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: "On the basis of the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 11, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 11, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED. The Court REMANDS the matter to the Arbitrator for clarification and interpretation of the Original Award in a manner consistent with this Order. The Clerk is DI RECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff on the Complaint and Counterclaim. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on January 25, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipant s registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 v. Hawaiian Airlines | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hawaiian Airlines | |
Represented By: | William N. Ota |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter_claimant: Hawaiian Airlines | |
Represented By: | William N. Ota |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter_defendant: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 | |
Represented By: | Pamela D. Chandran |
Represented By: | Ira L. Gottlieb |
Represented By: | Stefan M. Reinke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 | |
Represented By: | Stefan M. Reinke |
Represented By: | Ira L. Gottlieb |
Represented By: | Pamela D. Chandran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.