Huang v. Behpour et al
| Donald Huang |
| Queen Emma Regency, LLC, John Doe Defendants 1-10, Roe Corporations 1-10, Roe Partnerships 1-10, Roe Governmental Entities 1-10, Jane Doe Defendants 1-10, Armand Behpour and GC Pacific, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00456 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| UNASSIGNED |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 42 ; 52 ; 57 ; 61 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/2/12. -- " The court grants Huang's motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court grants the motion without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d). The court also denies the motion to strike ECF No. 52-3. However, the court directs the Clerk of Court to immediately seal that document." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
