Yonemoto v. Shinseki
Ronald M. Yonemoto |
Eric K. Shinseki |
1:2011cv00533 |
August 31, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 231 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO (1) DENY DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS; AND (2) GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, DOC. NO. 226 re 226 , 228 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/20/2016. "The court has reviewed the F&R de novo, and has analyzed Plaintiff's Objections and Defendant's Opposition. Being intimately familiar with the procedural and substantive history of this case, the court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections and ADOPTS the F&R. Accordingly, the court awards Plaintiff $10,000 in attorneys' fees and $1,250 in costs." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 198 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/10/2015. "In sum, the court concludes that Plaintiff has not established his claims against Defendant, except as to his Title VII retaliation claim based on the denial of authorized absence on June 16, 2010. The court awards damages on this claim in the total amount of $1,867.40. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case file." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 139 ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE, IN PART, THE COURT'S ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 135 ; AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQ UEST TO LIMIT HIS TITLE VII RETALIATORY HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM. Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/22/2015.Excerpt of order:"Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Vacate, in Part, t he March 10, 2014 Order. Plaintiff seeks to (1) limit his Title VII retaliatory hostile work environment claim to events starting April 29, 2010 as opposed to August 2008 as he alleged in his pleadings; and (2) broaden his Rehabilitation Act clai m based on an argument he never properly or previously raised. Based on the following, the court construes Plaintiff's first argument as a motion to withdraw this portion of his claim and GRANTS such request. The court otherwise DENIES Plain tiffs Motion to Vacate the March 10, 2014 Order." "[T]he court...GRANTS Plaintiff's request to limit his Title VII retaliatory hostile work environment claim. For trial, Plaintiff's claims include the following:(1) Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim based on the June 16, 2010 denial of authorized absence, and the removal of Plaintiff from his private office.(2) Plaintiff's Title VII retaliatory hostile work environment claim based on a refusal to assign Plaintiff meaningful work, actionable beginning April 26, 2010;(3) Plaintiff's denial of reasonable accommodation Rehabilitation Act claim based on discrete acts occurring on or after July 3, 2011; and (4) Pl aintiff's hostile work environment Rehabilitation Act claim, occurring from November 30, 2010 to the present." (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications. |
Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT ERIC K. SHINSEKI, DOC. NO. 50 re 50 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/10/2014. "For the reasons stated above, the cou rt GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment. Remaining in this action are: (1) Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim based on the June 16, 2010 denial of AA; (2) Plaintiff's Title VII retaliatory hostile work environment claim based on a refusal to assign Plaintiff meaningful work; and (3) Plaintiff's Rehabilitation Act claims, to the extent based on conduct occurring after the June 24, 2011 denial of requests for accommoda tion." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yonemoto v. Shinseki | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald M. Yonemoto | |
Represented By: | Elbridge W. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.