Beckstrand v. Read et al
Matthew Beckstrand |
Does 1-10, Nettie Simmons and Thomas Read |
1:2011cv00597 |
September 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
UNASSIGNED |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS THOMAS READ AND NETTIE SIMMON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 35 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/26/12. "The court GRANTS the Motion in part. The Court gran ts summary judgment on Counts I and II to Defendants on limitations grounds. In all other respects, the Motion is DENIED. This order leaves Count III for further adjudication." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 22 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS re 6 ; 21 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/29/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.