Pacific Stock, Inc. v. MacArthur & Company Inc. et al
Pacific Stock, Inc. |
MacArthur & Company Inc., Dream Communications Inc., Gayle Ching, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Associations 1-10 |
1:2011cv00720 |
December 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
DAVID ALAN EZRA |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION for 21 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/2/12. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 21 Magistrate Judge's FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION To Grant Plaintiff's Motion For Entry of Default Judgment As To Defendant Dream Communications, Inc. re 17 . Signed by Judge BARRY M. KURREN on 9/10/12. (gls, )CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.