Torres v. Read et al
Plaintiff:
William Torres
Defendant:
Thomas Read and John Does 1-10
Case Number:
1:2011cv00724
Filed:
December 2, 2011
Court:
Hawaii District Court
Office:
Hawaii Office
County:
Honolulu
Referring Judge:
BARRY M. KURREN
Presiding Judge:
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights
Cause of Action:
28:1441
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| November 14, 2012 | 59 |
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT READ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON TORRES'S FEDERAL CLAIMS AND REMANDING TORRES'S STATE-LAW CLAIMS re 12 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/14/12. " For the reasons stated a bove, the court grants summary judgment in favor of Read on all federal claims (First, Second, and Third Causes of Action). The court remands the state-law claims (the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Causes of Action) to the Circuit Court of the First Circu it, State of Hawaii. The clerk of Court is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
