Kowalski v. Hawaii International Seafood, Inc. et al
| William R. Kowalski and Hawaii International Seafood, Inc. |
| Anova Food, LLC, Clearsmoke Technologies, LTD, Does 1-10 and Anova Food, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00795 |
| December 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| UNASSIGNED |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
409
ORDER DENYING ANOVA FOOD, LLC'S MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF No. 380 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 12/10/2014. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
334
ORDER Finding Defendants Anova Food, Inc. and Anova Food, LLC Are Not Precluded From Asserting A Patent Invalidity Defense. Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 5/14/14. (gab, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registe red to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
311
Claim Construction ORDER. Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 3/31/2014. (gab, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ANOVA FOOD, LLC's MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 112 ) AND DENYING DEFENDANT CLEARSMOKE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 113 ) AND DENYING DEFENDANT ANOVA FOOD, INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 115 ) AND DENYING DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/31/2013. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING SERVICE UPON CLEARSMOKE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.'S U.S. COUNSEL 41 . Signed by JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI on 08/10/2012. (eps) -- Plaintiffs have not presen ted any facts to suggest that they are unable to locate Clearsmoke in Malta or that they have attempted service in accordance with the Hague Service Convention. Under these circumstances, the Court declines to exercise its discretion to authorize alt ernative service on Clearsmoke's U.S. counsel CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
