Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. La Rana Hawaii, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: Does 1-15, La Rana Hawaii, LLC and Altres, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00799
Filed: December 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 14 DEFENDANT ALTRES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011 AND (2) GRANTING 30 DEFENDANT LA RANA HAWAII, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011: &q uot;On the basis of the foregoing, ALTRES's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed December 30, 2011, filed on March 15, 2012 is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Complaint and DENIED to the extent it requests that the Court not grant l eave to amend. La Rana's Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed December 30, 2011, filed on April 26, 2012, is HEREBY GRANTED. The present action is STAYED pending the parties' good-faith conciliation. Upon completing proper conciliation, the EE OC may file a First Amended Complaint no later than November 1, 2012. The Court CAUTIONS the EEOC that, if it fails to file its First Amended Complaint by November 1, 2012, the claims that this Order dismissed without prejudice will be automatical ly dismissed with prejudice. Further, if the EEOCs First Amended Complaint fails to cure the defects identified in this Order or adds new parties, claims, facts, or theories of liability, this Court may dismiss those claims with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.". Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on August 22, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. La Rana Hawaii, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-15
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: La Rana Hawaii, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altres, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: Michael J. Farrell
Represented By: Anna Y. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?