State of Hawaii, Department of Education v. L. et al
| State of Hawaii, Department of Education |
| Ria L. and Rita L. |
| 1:2012cv00007 |
| January 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY PUT 33 . Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 10/30/2012. ~ The Administrative Decision, issued on November 29, 2011, addressed the merits of whether ABC was an appropriate placement for Ria. ABC became Rias current educational placement for stay put purposes as of that date. Ria is entitled to stay put at ABC while the case is on appeal. The DOE must continue to pay for Rias tuition and provide transportation to ABC until all proceedings with respect t o the appeal are completed. The DOE must also pay any outstanding fees owed to ABC for Ria's education to date. Defendants' Motion for Stay Put (Doc. 33) is GRANTED.(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParti cipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
