Bateman v. Countrywide Home Loans et al
| Chance K.S. Bateman |
| Countrywide Home Loans, Bank of New York Mellon, The, CWABS, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., Charter Funding, Kevin A. Durham, Caleb G. Hargis, Corporate Does 1-50, John Does 1-50 and Jane Does 1-50 |
| 1:2012cv00033 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING MOTION SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT re 46 , 60 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/20/13. "The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed, and the motion seeking leave to file a Third Amended Complaint is denied. Bateman is given leave to file a motion seeking leave to file a different Third Amended Complaint no later than June 14, 2013. Any such proposed complaint must take into account the rulings in this case. If Bateman fails to timely file such a motion, the Clerk of Court will automatically enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 28 ; 30 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/14/12. " Bateman is given leave to file a Second Amended Complaint no later than December 7, 2012. Unless Bateman alleges facts supporting a claim that an assignment of his loan was void, he may not reassert claims based on the argument that Bank of New York does not have the right to enforce the loan documents. With respect to any other claim, including any potential claim under section 480-2, Bateman should specifically allege which Defendant he is seeking to hold liable and facts supporting the claim. For example, he should not refer to "Defendants" generally when he is arguing that Countrywide did not have an operable loan modification program." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
