Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. CTS Earthmoving, Inc. et al
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| Louisa Twigg-Smith, Christian Twigg-Smith Revocable Living Trust, CTS Earthmoving, Inc. and Christian Twigg-Smith |
| 1:2012cv00089 |
| February 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Outside state of Hawaii |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 29 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/26/2012. ~ Order adopts the "Findings and Recommendation to Grant Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment" (doc 29 ). (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of El ectronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A copy of the order has also been served this date by first class mail addressed to those parties identified in the Certificate of Service portion of doc no. 27 : Simon Klevansky, Esq., identified as the attorney for defendants Christian Twigg-Smith Revocable Living Trust, Trustee; Chrstian Twigg-Smith; and Louisa Twigg-Smith; and CTS Earthmoving, Inc.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
