Javier et al v. State of Hawaii et al
Severino Javier and Mark Edward |
John and Jane Does 1-100, G* Y. Okuda, RK Arnold Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, State of Hawaii, Court of the Second Circuit, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nationals Association, Central Pacific Bank, Bank Home Loans Servicing LP, Karyn A. Doi and Anya Y. Perez |
1:2012cv00145 |
March 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Other Fraud |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' 12 , 35 MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 16 MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: "On the basis of the foregoing, this action is HEREBY DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The Court therefore D ENIES AS MOOT CPB's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief Can Be Granted, filed May 23, 2012, and the BoA Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed August 10, 2012. The Court also DENIES Plaintiffs motion for writ of mandamus, filed May 30, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.". Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 17, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.