Spears v. State of Hawaii et al
| Everett Spears |
| State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii, Tani Dydasco, Thomas L. Reed, John Doe Defendants 1-10 and Jane Doe Defendants 1-10 |
| 1:2012cv00218 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER Dismissing Action With Respect to Thomas L. Read. "The court declines to grant Spears leave to serve Read. Instead, the court orders this action dismissed without prejudice with respect to Read. Because no claims remain for adjudication, the court directs the clerk of court to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/1/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to rece ive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER Granting Defendant Tani Dydasco's Motion For Summary Judgment; Order To Show Cause Why Action With Respect To Thomas L. Read Should Not be Dismissed. "The court grants Defendant Tani Dydascos 29 motion for summary judgment. The o nly claims left in this case are those asserted against Read, who has not been served with the Complaint and summons in this case. As required above, no later than November 17, 2017, Spears must demonstrate good cause for his failure to timely ser ve Read. Absent such a demonstration, the Complaint will be dismissed with respect to Read, and judgment shall be entered against Spears and in favor of Defendants." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/8/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE § 1983 AND STATE TORT CLAIMS FOR MONEY DAMAGES AGAINST THE STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, AND THE INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, AS WELL AS ALL § 1983 CLAIMS BASED ON ALLEGED VIOLAT IONS OF STATE LAW; ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PROSPECTIVE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CLAIMS UNDER § 1983; ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES re 4 ; 10 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/31/12. ("For the reasons stated above, the court dismisses all of Spears's claims, except for the damage claims asserted against Dydasco and Read in their individual capacities. As noted above, Spears may file an Amen ded Complaint no later than June 12, 2012, that clarifies his prospective injunctive relief claim. The court also grants Spears's Application, which seeks leave to proceed without prepayment of fees.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
