Ilae v. Tenn et al
| John S. Ilae |
| Louis M. Kealoha, Honolulu, City and County of, Rodney Tenn and John Does 1-25 |
| 1:2012cv00316 |
| June 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| ALAN C KAY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF' COMPLAINT 4 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 08/20/2013. (eps) -- The Court also GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amende d complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Court's written order to address the rulings set forth in this order. The Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that, if he fails to timely file an amended complaint, the claims which this Court has dis missed without prejudice will be automatically dismissed with prejudice. Further, if the amended complaint fails to address the defects identified in this Order, the Court may dismiss such claims with prejudice. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
