Jewel Of Kahana, LLC et al v. Donnelly et al
| James Lecron, Karen Lecron, Melinda Walsh, Michael Walsh, Jewel Of Kahana, LLC, Meritage Investments, LLC, Aubery Family Limited Partnership, Jeff Aubery and Patty Aubery |
| Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly and Hang 10 Investments, LLC |
| 1:2012cv00347 |
| June 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| Other Contract |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD. Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 3/28/2013. ~ Petitioners Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly, and Hang 10 Investments, LLC's Statement of Relief Requested in Their Motion to Confirm in Part and V acate in Part Arbitration Award, filed on July 25, 2012 (ECF No. 30 ) is: GRANTED with respect to the Motion to Confirm the Arbitrators rulings that: (1) The Donnellys (Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly, and Hang 10 Investments, LLC) are the prevai ling parties against the JKL Parties (Jewel of Kahana, LLC, Meritage Investments, LLC, Aubery Family Limited Partnership, Jeff Aubery, Patty Aubery, James LeCron, Karen LeCron, Melinda Walsh, and Michael Walsh) on the Counterclaim; (2) The Donnellys (Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly, and Hang 10 Investments, LLC) are entitled to recover the award of attorneys' fees and costs related to the Counterclaim from the JKL Parties (Jewel of Kahana, LLC, Meritage Investments, LLC, Aubery Family Limi ted Partnership, Jeff Aubery, Patty Aubery, James LeCron, Karen LeCron, Melinda Walsh, and Michael Walsh), jointly and severally; and (3) The Donnellys (Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly, and Hang 10 Investments, LLC) shall recover from the JKL Parties (Jewel of Kahana, LLC, Meritage Investments, LLC, Aubery Family Limited Partnership, Jeff Aubery, Patty Aubery, James LeCron, Karen LeCron, Melinda Walsh, and Michael Walsh), jointly and severally, the total amount of $283,093.87, which include s: (a) $201,323.12 in attorneys' fees and $29,677.00 in costs, (b) $14,000.00 as and for American Arbitration Association fees incurred by the Donnellys (Mark Donnelly, Chrissy Donnelly, and Hang 10 Investments, LLC) up to and inc luding November 30, 2010, and (c) $38,093.75, as and for ADR Services, Inc. fees and costs up to and including November 30, 2012; and DENIED with respect to the Motion to Vacate the Arbitrator's ruling related to the valuation of the Donnel lys' interest in Jewel of Kahana, LLC..Respondents Jewel of Kahana, LLC, Meritage Investments, LLC, Aubery Family Limited Partnership, Jeff Aubery, Patty Aubery, James LeCron, Karen LeCron, Melinda Walsh, and Michael Walsh'sMotion to Vacat e in Part Arbitration Award (ECF No. 31 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Final Judgment, incorporating and confirming the Arbitrator's Final Order, issued on February 13, 2012 and served on May 16, 2012, and close the case. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00347-HG-KSC, 1:12-cv-00419-HG-KSC(ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
