Tia v. Tupeni et al
Peter R. Tia |
Gau'ula Tupeni, John Tia and Benjamin Salima |
1:2012cv00374 |
July 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 11 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/31/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Peter R. Tia served by first class mail at the address of record on August 31, 2012. |
Filing 9 DISMISSAL ORDER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/20/12. --"Accordingly, the Complaint and action are DISMISSED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to reassert these claims in the future, he may do so by concurrentl y submitting the entire $350.00 filing fee when he files the action. Any pending motions are terminated. The Clerk shall close the case." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Peter R. Tia shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on August 21, 2012. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.