Jackson v. Foodland Super Market, Limited et al
Liza A. Jackson |
Foodland Super Market, Limited, John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5, Doe Corporations 1-5, Doe LLCs 1-5, Doe Partnerships 1-5, Doe No-Profit Organizations1-5 and Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5 |
1:2012cv00443 |
August 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
HELEN GILLMOR |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FOODLAND SUPER MARKET, LIMITED dba SACK N SAVE FOODS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 25 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/25/13. ~ Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plain tiff consents to the granting of summary judgment as to the following claims: (Count II) Hostile Work Environment, (Count III) Infliction of Emotional Distress, and (Count IV) Defamation. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to (Count I) Violation of Hawaii Discrimination Laws. There are no remaining claims or parties herein. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.