U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC v. Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC
Defendant: Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 1:2012cv00538
Filed: October 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 87 , 94 , 106 , 114 , 121 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/7/2014. Excerpt of Conclusion: "[T]he Motions and Substantive Joinder (Doc. Nos. 87 , 94 , 106 , 114 , and 121 ) are DENIED, except for Composite Pipe's claim that it is entitled to the second installment payment...." "To that extent only, the court GRANTS Composite Pipe's Motion for Summary Judgment in part. Doc No. 106 . All other issues remain for trial." Written Order follows hearing on SJ motions held 9/29/2014. Minutes of hearing: doc no . 162 ]. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, DOC. NO. 90 re 90 , 129 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/30/201 4. "The court GRANTS Defendant/Counterclaimant Frank Collucio Construction Co.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 90. Accordingly, the court STRIKES the City's tenth defense in its Answer to the Amended C ounterclaim regarding lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC v. Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC
Represented By: Erik D. Eike
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?