U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC v. Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC |
Defendant: |
Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America |
Case Number: |
1:2012cv00538 |
Filed: |
October 3, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Office: |
Hawaii Office |
County: |
Honolulu |
Presiding Judge: |
KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
Presiding Judge: |
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 7, 2014 |
Filing
163
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 87 , 94 , 106 , 114 , 121 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/7/2014. Excerpt of Conclusion: "[T]he Motions and Substantive Joinder (Doc. Nos. 87 , 94 , 106 , 114 , and 121 ) are DENIED, except for Composite Pipe's claim that it is entitled to the second installment payment...." "To that extent only, the court GRANTS Composite Pipe's Motion for Summary Judgment in part. Doc No. 106 . All other issues remain for trial." Written Order follows hearing on SJ motions held 9/29/2014. Minutes of hearing: doc no . 162 ]. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
July 30, 2014 |
Filing
130
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, DOC. NO. 90 re 90 , 129 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/30/201 4. "The court GRANTS Defendant/Counterclaimant Frank Collucio Construction Co.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 90. Accordingly, the court STRIKES the City's tenth defense in its Answer to the Amended C ounterclaim regarding lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?