Adwalls Media, LLC v. Adwalls, LLC et al
| Adwalls Media, LLC |
| Adwalls, LLC, John W. Rowe, Jeffrey D. Zimmerman and Does 1-5 |
| 1:2012cv00614 |
| November 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
ORDER RE. MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE IMPROPERLY FILED STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. No later than September 14, 2020, Ad Walls, LLC, shall file the appropriate LR 7.8 certification and shall explain the delay in its reaction to the filing. Alternatively, Ad Walls, LLC, may file a document withdrawing the motion without prejudice to its refiling once a proper prefiling conference has been completed. For its part , Adwalls Media, LLC, shall, by September 14, 2020, submit a statement as to why the Stipulated Judgment and Order was filed without a determination by Magistrate Judge Barry Kurren "based on briefing provided to him by the parties," as required by the parties agreement. See ECF No. 240-3, PageID # 5786. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/9/2020. (cib)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER REGARDING COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT: 1) GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT I (BREACH OF PROMISE) WITH RESPECT TO ADWALLS MEDIA, LLC, BUT DENYING MOTION WITH RESPECT TO JAMES E. BLINN; 2) DENYING MOTION FOR J UDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COUNT II (FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION RELATING TO PARTNERS) AND DENYING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM ASSERTED AGAINST JAMES E. BLINN, BUT GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH R ESPECT TO THE FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM; AND 3) GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COUNT V (FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM RELATING TO EXPERIENCE) re 128 , 130 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWA Y on 1/30/2015. "The motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment filed by Adwalls Media and Blinn, ECF Nos. 128 and 130, are granted in part and denied in part." "With respect to the brea ch of promise claim asserted in Count I of the Counterclaim and Third-Party Claim, summary judgment is granted with respect to Adwalls Media but denied with respect to Blinn." "With respect to the fraudulent misrepresentation cl aim asserted in Count II of the Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint, the court denies the motion for judgment on the pleadings, but grants summary judgment in favor of both Adwalls Media and Blinn." "With respect to the un just enrichment claim asserted only against Blinn in Count II of the Third Party Complaint, the court denies the motion for judgment on the pleadings and denies the motion for summary judgment." With respect to the fraudulent misrepres entation claim asserted in Count V of the Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint, the court grants the motion for judgment on the pleadings and denies as moot the motion for summary judgment. Ad Walls is given leave to file an Amended Complaint no later than February 6, 2015, limited as discussed in this order. The court does not change any court-imposed deadline or the trial date." "The parties are directed to contact the Magistrate Judge within seven calen dar days to schedule a settlement conference at the earliest date available on the Magistrate Judge's calendar." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notif ications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT re 26 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/20/13. "The court denies Ad Walls' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Count II, but grants Ad Walls' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Counts I, III, and IV. Given this court's ruling as to piercing the veil of a limited liability company, Count II survives only against Ad Walls." (emt, )CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
