Paet v. Fernandez

Paet v. Fernandez

Plaintiff:	Gloria J. Paet
Defendant:	Monica Fernandez
Case Number:	1:2013cv00079
Filed:	February 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge:	J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 5, 2013	Filing 12 ORDER: (1) Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint With Leave To Amend; And (2) Dismissing As Moot; (a) "Motion For Perpetual Mandatory Injunction re: Ejectment for Squatting, Trespassing, And Destruction of Property. Motion To Show Cause Re: Resp ondents To Show Cause Why They Should Not Be Indicted," Doc. No. 2; (b) "Motion For Preventive, Prohibitory, Quia Timet And Perpetual Injunction," Doc. No. 3; (c) "Motion For Writ of Recaption," Doc. No. 9; And (d) "Amen ded Motion For Perpetual Mandatory Injunction Re: Ejectment, And Amended Motion To Show Cause Re: Respondents To Show Cause Why They Should Not Be Indicted For Multiple Crimes Committed," Doc. No. 10 re 3 , 9 , 10 , 2 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICH AEL SEABRIGHT on 3/5/13. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Date Filed

Document Text

March 5, 2013

Filing 12 ORDER: (1) Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint With Leave To Amend; And (2) Dismissing As Moot; (a) "Motion For Perpetual Mandatory Injunction re: Ejectment for Squatting, Trespassing, And Destruction of Property. Motion To Show Cause Re: Resp ondents To Show Cause Why They Should Not Be Indicted," Doc. No. 2; (b) "Motion For Preventive, Prohibitory, Quia Timet And Perpetual Injunction," Doc. No. 3; (c) "Motion For Writ of Recaption," Doc. No. 9; And (d) "Amen ded Motion For Perpetual Mandatory Injunction Re: Ejectment, And Amended Motion To Show Cause Re: Respondents To Show Cause Why They Should Not Be Indicted For Multiple Crimes Committed," Doc. No. 10 re 3 , 9 , 10 , 2 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICH AEL SEABRIGHT on 3/5/13. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paet v. Fernandez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Monica Fernandez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria J. Paet
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?