Tierney v. Atkin
| Michael C. Tierney |
| Thomas Atkin and Dawn West |
| 1:2013cv00136 |
| March 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLIANT UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915(A)(b)(1) AND DENYING PENDING MOTIONS re 12 , 13 , 14 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/13/13. "1. The Second Amended Comp laint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(a). 2. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a third amended complaint on or before May 30, 2013, in compliance with this Order. If Plaint iff fails to do so, this action shall be DISMISSED without further notice and the Clerk of Court SHALL enter judgment stating that the dismissal was pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward a copy of the court 's prisoner civil rights complaint form to Plaintiff so that he may comply with this Order. 4. All pending motions are DENIED. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that he may not file, and the court will take no action on, any motions he files until he has submitted a sufficient amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted herein." Motions terminated: 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Michael C. Tierney, 14 MOTION for Discovery filed by Michael C. Tierney. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Michael C. Tierney served by first class mail at the address of record (Halawa Correctional Facility) on May 13, 2013. A copy of the court's prisoner civil rights complaint form with instructions, shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Tierney.
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 7 , 10 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/30/13. "1. The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(a). 2. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint on or before May 30, 2013, in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, this action shall be AUTOMATICALLY DISMISSED, without further notice and the Cle rk of Court SHALL enter judgment stating that the dismissal was pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward a copy of the court's prisoner civil rights complaint form to Plaintiff so that he may comply with this Order. 4. All pending motions are DENIED. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that he may not file, and the court will take no action on, any motions he files until he has submitted a sufficient amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted herein.&q uot; ( Motion terminated: 10 MOTION for Emergency Dental Treatment filed by Michael C. Tierney.) (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notificat ions received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Michael C. Tierney shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on May 1, 2013. A copy of the court's prisoner civil rights complaint form shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Tierney.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
