Baker v. State of Hawai'i et al.
| Haunani Y. Baker and Frederick H.K. Baker, Jr. |
| Jane Does 1-100, John Does 1-100, Robert Korbel Davis, Jr., Hugh E. Gordon, Scott D. Parker, State of Hawai'i, Neil Abercrombie and Hawaiian Homelands, Department of, State of Hawaii |
| 1:2013cv00159 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| Other Fraud |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/11/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' AND DEFENDANT ROBERT KORBEL DAVIS JR.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/13/2013. ~ This Court reminds Plaintiffs that they must serve Defendants Hugh E. Gordon and Scott D. Parker with the First Amended Complaint by December 20, 2013. [Dkt. no. 69.] This Court CAUTIONS Plaintiffs that, if they fail to serve Defendants Gordon and Parker with the First Amended Complaint by December 20, 2013, this Court will dismiss Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Gordon and Parker without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). ~ Re: 71 MOTION for Reconsideration re 66 O rder on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND FILED JUNE 12, 2013 27 AND GRANTING DEFENDANT ROBERT KORBEL DAVIS JR.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AME NDED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND FILED JUNE 12, 2013 44 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/4/2013. [Order follows hearing held 10/2/2013. Minutes: 63 ] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SE RVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION re: 23 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 7/24/2013. [Written order follows the Court's minute order issued July 19, 2013 as docket entry no. 36 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
