Hancock et al v. Kulana Partners, LLC et al
| William R. Hancock and Profit Sharing Trust |
| Kulana Partners, LLC, Fidelity National Title And Escrow of Hawaii Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2013cv00198 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT KULANA PARTNERS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT FIDELITY'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; (3) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND; AND (4) DISMISSING CASE WIT HOUT LEAVE TO AMEND re 103 , 118 , 119 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 9/23/2020. For the reasons set forth herein, Fidelity's supplemental motion for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. No. 118, and Kulana� 39;s supplemental motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 119, are GRANTED, and the Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Fidelitys motion to strike jury demand, Dkt. No. 103, is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is instructed to enter Judgment in favor of Defendants pursuant to this Order. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY re 102 , 103 , 104 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/20/2020. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion to stay, Dkt. No. 102, is GRANTED. As a result, all proceedings in this case, including the briefing required by the Court's January 24, 2020 Entering Order and Fidelity's Motion to Strike Jury Demand, Dkt. No. 103, are STAYED pending a decision by the Hawai'i Supreme Court in Grinpas et al. v. Kapaa 382, LLC et al., No. SCWC-14-0000870. Within thirty (30) days of entry of a decision by the Hawai'i Supreme Court, the parties shall file a joint status report in this case. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT, VACATING ORDER IN PART, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 49 , 50 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/8/2020. Therefore, in light of the foregoing, the Clerk is instructed to VACATE the Judgment, Dkt. No. 50. In addition, the Clerk is instructed to VACATE the Order, Dkt. No. 49, to the extent the Order determined that Plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute-of-limitations. Because the basis for dismissing Pl aintiff's claims has been vacated, and this case has, thus, been re-opened, it is necessary to proceed anew. Having considered the parties' positions in their joint statement, the Court concludes that it is most efficient to set a briefing schedule in order to address the arguments raised in Defendants' motions that were not relied upon by the Court in its January 2014 Order dismissing Plaintiff's claims. Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: On or before February 7, 2020, Defendants, individually or collectively, may file a supplemental brief in support of the arguments raised in their original motions and not as-yet conclusively determined by this Court. On or b efore February 21, 2020, Plaintiff may file a response brief in opposition to any argument raised in Defendants' supplemental brief(s). On or before March 6, 2020, Defendants may file an optional reply brief in support of their positions. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTIONS OF LAW re 70 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 6/9/2017. " This matter is stayed pending disposition of the certification request by the Hawaii Supreme Court. In the interim, the Cour t directs the administrative closure of this case. The case will be reopened by the Clerk of Court upon disposition by the Hawaii Supreme Court, or upon further order of this Court. Such an order reopening the case may be issued sua sponte, or a party may petition for reopening upon a showing of good cause." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 2/1/2017. Re: 56 USCA Memorandum -- Upon the limited remand from the Ninth Circuit for purposes of assessing the basis of federal court jurisdiction, the Court determines that the requirements of diversity jurisdiction set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) are satisfied. The parties shall notify the appellate panel that has retained jurisdiction to hear any fut ure appeals in this matter of this Court's finding regarding subject matter jurisdiction. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. ad hoc: USCA Clerk
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT KULANA PARTNERS, LLC'S 16 MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE & ESCROW OF HAWAII INC.'S 37 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFFWILLIAM HANC OCK'S 42 COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/10/2014. ~ The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
