Tokuda et al v. Calio et al
Kevin Louis, Derrick Louis, Richard C. Louis and Lynell Tokuda |
Doe Entities 1-10, Doe Defendants 1-100, County of Kauai and Chris Calio |
1:2013cv00202 |
April 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Kauai |
BARRY M. KURREN |
DERRICK K. WATSON |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 225 ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CHRIS CALIO'S 171 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (2) GRANTING COUNTY OF KAUAI'S 175 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/30/2014. ~ Calio 39;s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Counts II and III, to the extent that Tokuda, in her capacity as personal representative of Louis estate, asserts a Section 1983 Fourth Amendment claim against Calio in his individual capacity. Defen dants Calio and the County of Kauai's Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED in all other respects. **terminating motion for joinders to 171 175 : 174 Motion for Joinder, 177 Motion for Joinder; 179 Motion for Joinder (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.