Barker et al v. Gottlieb et al
Charles Barker, III and Does 1-10 |
Joshua L. Gottlieb, Jonathan Dubowsky, Donald Borneman, Charles Hall, Scott Harris, Value Change Advisors, The, Gemco-Pacific Energy LLC and Roes 1-25 |
1:2013cv00236 |
May 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Contract: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT re 115 Motion for Reconsideration re 113 Order re 121 Exhibits. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYAS HI on 02/27/2015. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 113 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT re 104 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/13/2015. There be ing no remaining claims or pending motions in this case, this Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants pursuant to the Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Compla int, [filed 10/24/14 (dkt. no. 102 ),] and to close this case. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 111 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE re 104 MOTION for Reconsideration re 102 Order on Motion to Dismiss, filed by Charles Barker, III. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/10/2014. -- th is Court has denied Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse, reassignment of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration to another district judge is not necessary. Defendants' memorandum in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is due by December 19, 2014. Plaintiff's optional reply in support of the Motion for Reconsideration is due by December 31, 2014. This Court will take Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration under advisement thereafter. (eps)< FONT SIZE=1>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 102 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT re 94 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/24/2014. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, filed July 15, 2014, is HEREBY GRANTED. There being no remaining claims in this case, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to enter judgment and close the case on November 17, 2014, unless Plaintiff files a timely motion for reconsideration of the instant Order. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 88 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 59 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 05/28/2014. -- This Court grants Plaintiff leave to file a third amended comp laint setting forth the claims that this Court has dismissed without prejudice, if Plaintiff can amend those claims to cure the defects identified in this Order. Plaintiff shall file his third amended complaint by no later than June 30, 2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 87 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 83 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's Motion For Perjury Sanctions, Deny Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, and Grant Defendants' Counter Motion forPro tective Order". Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 05/27/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 83 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PERJURY SANCTIONS, DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL, AND GRANT DEFENDANTS' COUNTER MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER -- re 71 MOTION for Sanctions file d by Charles Barker, III ; 73 MOTION to Compel filed by Charles Barker, III, Defendants' 76 Counter Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 04/16/2014. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on 04/17/2014 |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS re: 19 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/16/2013. Excerpt of Conclusion: "The Motion is GRANTED insofar as all of the claims in Plaintiff's Complaint are HEREBY DISMISSED. The Motion is DENIED insofar as the dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file his amended complaint by no later than November 27, 2013. This Court CAUTIONS Plaintif f that, if he fails to file his amended complaint by November 27, 2013, or if his amended complaint fails to cure the defects addressed in this Order, the claims that this Order dismissed without prejudice may be dismissed with prejudice.&quo t; (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.