Barranco et al v. 3D Systems Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Print3D Corporation and Ronald Barranco
Defendant: 3D Systems Corporation and 3D Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00411
Filed: August 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), AND SECTION 3 OF THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404 AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF S' MOTION TO STRIKE ARGUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS re 30 ; re 7 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/28/2014. -- Defendants' Mot ion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(6), and Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404,filed October 21, 2013, is HEREBY DENIED. Plaintiffs 9; Motion to Strike Arguments Incorporated by Reference in Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed January 15, 2014, is HEREBY GRANTED. The Court ORDERS the clerk of court to TRANSFER VENUE of this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina no earlier than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. The clerk of court shall close the case thereafter. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVI CEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barranco et al v. 3D Systems Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3D Systems Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3D Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Print3D Corporation
Represented By: Kamala S. Haake
Represented By: Robert K. Fricke
Represented By: Joachim P. Cox
Represented By: Jack R. Naiditch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Barranco
Represented By: Jack R. Naiditch
Represented By: Kamala S. Haake
Represented By: Robert K. Fricke
Represented By: Joachim P. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?