Espinoza v. Koyanagi et al
Denise Espinoza |
Shirley Kawamura, Paul Wong and Fay Koyanagi |
1:2013cv00415 |
August 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS AS MOOT re 1 , 3 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/28/13. "Espinoza may file a First Amended Complai nt that is complete in itself (that is, does not incorporate any prior complaint by reference) no later than September 9, 2013. She must also either pay the civil filing fee or submit a new IFP. Failure to meet the above deadline shall cause this action to be automatically dismissed. Given the court's dismissal of Espinoza's Complaint, the court denies Espinoza's IFP as moot." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Denise Espinoza served by first class mail at the address of record. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form shall be included in the mailing to Ms. Espinoza. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.