Tomlinson et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
||Rhonda L. Snyder, Susan M. Tomlinson and John C. Tomlinson
||Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, U.S. Bank, N.A. and Doe Defendants 1-50
||October 24, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||BARRY M. KURREN
||SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 18, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 32 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/18/2014. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic not ifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|January 30, 2014
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND, AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SEVER CLAIMS AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S JOINDER IN MOTION TO SEVER CLAIMS re 10 , 15 , 17 - Signed by Judge BARRY M . KURREN on 1/29/2014. "The Court finds that neither the doctrine of fraudulent joinder nor fraudulent misjoinder permit the Court to ignore incomplete diversity in this case. Without complete diversity, this Court lacks jurisdic tion. Accordingly, the Court finds that remand to state court is proper and that the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Deutsche Bank's Motion to Sever. Because the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the Motion to Sever, US Bank's joinder in the motion is rendered moot. For the foregoing reasons, the Court FINDS and RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand be GRANTED, and ORDERS that Defendant's Motion to Sever be DENIED for lack of jurisdiction, and Defendant's M otion for Joinder be TERMINATED as Moot." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?