Lorenzo et al v. State of Hawaii et al
| Neil Abercrombie, State of Hawaii and John and Jane Does 1-50 |
| United States of America and Windyceslau D. Lorenzo |
| 1:2013cv00568 |
| October 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re 1 ; 4 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/6/13. "Accordingly, no later than November 29, 2013, Lorenzo may file an Amended Complaint that asserts claims over which this court has subject matter jurisdiction." " If Lorenzo chooses to file an Amended Complaint, he must pay the applicable filing fee or submit another Application. Failure to timely file a n Amended Complaint along with payment of the applicable filing fee or submission of a new Application will result in the automatic dismissal of this action." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants r egistered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Windyceslau D. Lorenzo shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on November 7, 2013. A copy of the court's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Lorenzo.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
