Du Preez v. Banis et al
Plaintiff: Roni Du Preez
Defendant: Rick Banis, Don Carano, Fred Scarpello, John Mackall, Western Equities, LLC, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Entities 1-10 and Doe Governmental Entities 1-10
Case Number: 1:2014cv00171
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 359 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 356 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/20/2017. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electr onic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 338 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND FOR NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO FRCP RULES 50(B) AND 59 re 329 Motion for Judgment NOV. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 07/27/2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 211 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 137 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re 148 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 09/30/2015. -- On the basis of the foregoing, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 26, 2015, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENly, this Court: 1) GRANTS summary j udgment in favor of Defendants as to Counts II, III, IV, V, and VII; 2) GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendants Kent Green and Rachel Bridgewater as to Counts I and VI; and 3) DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to all other portions of Counts I and VI. There being no remaining claims against Green and Bridgewater, this Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to terminate them as parties. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPartici pants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL THE COURT'S JANUARY 30, 2015 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 74 ] (28 USC § 1292(B)) re 76 Defendants' Motion to Certify for an Interlocutory Appeal the Court's January 30, 2015 Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. [74[] (28 USC Section filed by Kent Green, Don Carano, Rachel Bridgewater, Rick Banis, Western Equities, LLC, John Mackall, Fred Sca rpello, WNP Enterprises LLC. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/27/2015. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. 38 ] 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/30/2015. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [Doc. 38], filed August 4, 2014, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED insofar as:- Count I is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant R acquel Bridgewater;- the portion of Count III alleging a tort claim for bad faith is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all Defendants;- the portion of Count III alleging a contract claim against Bridgewater for breach of the covenant of good fai th and fair dealing is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and - Counts II, IV, V, and VI are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all Defendants.Defendants' Motion is DENIED in all other respects.Plaintiff has until March 2, 2015 to file her seco nd amended complaint, consistent with the terms described in this Order. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED MOTION TO STRIKE & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT 34 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 07/14/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO REMAND 15 Motion to Strike ; 7 Motion to Remand Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 06/25/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Du Preez v. Banis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roni Du Preez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Banis
Represented By: Danielle K Kiyabu
Represented By: Andrew James Lautenbach
Represented By: Terence J. O'Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Carano
Represented By: Danielle K Kiyabu
Represented By: Andrew James Lautenbach
Represented By: Terence J. O'Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Scarpello
Represented By: Danielle K Kiyabu
Represented By: Andrew James Lautenbach
Represented By: Terence J. O'Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Mackall
Represented By: Danielle K Kiyabu
Represented By: Andrew James Lautenbach
Represented By: Terence J. O'Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Western Equities, LLC
Represented By: Danielle K Kiyabu
Represented By: Andrew James Lautenbach
Represented By: Terence J. O'Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Entities 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Governmental Entities 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?