Grindling v. Shores et al
Plaintiff: Chris Grindling
Defendant: Leval, Kissinger, Hope, Kaiser, Tajon, Shores, Mirkovich and Keala
Case Number: 1:2014cv00198
Filed: April 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Maui
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE: CLARIFICATION re 9 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/29/2014. " To clarify any confusion Plaintiff may still have, the court notifies him that he owes $50 in Fong, Civ. No. 14-00098SOM, and that he must file an in forma pauperis application or the full $400.00 filing fee in Shores, Civ. No. 14-00198 SOM. Because the time has passed for timely filing an in forma pauperis application in Shores, Civ. No. 14-0 0198 SOM, Plaintiff is GRANTED ten days from the date of this order to submit an in forma pauperis application. If he does so and his in forma pauperis application is granted, Plaintiff will only owe $350.00. If his in forma pauperis application is denied, he will owe $400.00. In the alternative, Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss Shores, Civ. No. 14-00198 SOM, in lieu of submitting the fee or an in forma pauperis application, and the court will then waive the fees based on his mistaken impression that he paid the fees when he sent his check to this court on March 12, 2014. To the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of any decisions to date in Fong or Shores, his Motions are DENIED." (e mt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Chris Grindling shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on May 30, 2014. An IFP application shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Grindling.
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION re 4 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/9/2014. "Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the April 24, 2014, Deficiency Order is DENIED. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED that, to avoid th e automatic dismissal of this action, he must pay the entire civil filing fee of $400 or submit an in forma pauperis application on or before May 24, 2014. In the alternative, Plaintiff may move to voluntarily dismiss this action before his c omplaint is screened." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electro nic Filing (NEF). Chris Grindling served by first class mail at the address of record on May 9, 2014. A copy of the court's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner form and it's instructions were included in the mailing to Mr. Grindling.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grindling v. Shores et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tajon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mirkovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Grindling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?